|
The New York Sun, January 26, 2005
Women Sue FDA
For Right To Buy Emergency Pill
In what is described as the first lawsuit of
its kind, women are suing the Food and Drug
Administration, demanding to be able to buy
a type of emergency birth control without a
prescription.
Plaintiffs in the suit, which was filed in federal
District Court in Brooklyn late last week,
include nine individuals and two advocacy organizations.
They argue that FDA foot-dragging on making
the emergency contraceptive, Plan B, available
on an over-the-counter basis is restricting
women's access to a safe form of emergency
birth control, which they say amounts to a
kind of sex discrimination. They want to force
the federal agency to make a decision on the
matter, which it has now been deliberating
for nearly two years.
"It is clear that the FDA has been dragging
its feet for a very long time on an issue that
is really very simple," the lead plaintiff
in the case and vice chairwoman of the New
York Reproductive Rights Task Force, Annie
Tummino, said. "We have been pressuring
the FDA in public campaigns over the past year,
and at this point, legal challenges are our
next best recourse."
FDA officials declined to comment on the suit.
Taken within 72 hours of unprotected sexual intercourse,
Plan B can reduce the risk of unwanted pregnancy
by up to 89%, though the drug is most effective
when taken within 24 hours after intercourse,
according to the drug's manufacturer, Barr
Laboratories.
Getting a doctor's appointment and finding the
medication within the 24-hour window can be
difficult and expensive, Ms. Tummino said.
Advocates of the drug believe that making emergency
contraceptives available on drugstore shelves
would be preferable to having women face a
choice later between motherhood and abortion.
Anti-abortion groups opposed to the drug have
said, however, that making Plan B available
without a prescription could pose a threat
to women's health and increase rates of unprotected
sex and sexually transmitted diseases among
teenagers. "They are demanding what they
want with no concern with how this drug will
impact innocent women and girls," the
senior policy director of Concerned Women for
America, Wendy Wright, said.
A study published in the January 5 issue of the
Journal of the American Medical Association
reported that women who have ready access to
emergency contraception are no more likely
to engage in unprotected sexual activity than
women who do not have access to the pills.
The study also found similar pregnancy rates
among women whether or not they had nonprescription
access to an emergency contraceptive.
In May, the FDA rejected Barr Laboratories' petition
to make Plan B available without a prescription
- against the recommendations of two of the
agency's advisory committees. The FDA's "non-approvable
letter" to the manufacturer cited inadequate
data regarding the impact of the drug on adolescents.
Last week, the FDA was expected to issue a decision
on Barr Laboratories' amended application,
which would have made the drug available without
a prescription only to women 16 and older.
Instead, the agency said it had not yet completed
its review of the matter. The application is
still pending, an FDA spokeswoman said, and
no target date for a decision has been established.
"Emergency contraceptives are really the
best thing since sliced bread for women,"
the director of the domestic legal program
for the Center for Reproductive Rights, Priscilla
Smith, said. "The FDA's mandate is to
approve drugs when it is in the public interest
to do so, and by delaying that, they are violating
federal law."
Ms. Smith said the FDA's foot-dragging on its
decision is effectively restricting access
to the contraceptive for all women, infringing
a right outlined 40 years ago by the Supreme
Court in the case of Griswold v. Connecticut.
Ms. Smith accused the FDA of ignoring accepted
medical data that the drug can prevent unwanted
pregnancies.
More than 70 medical and advocacy organizations,
including the American Medical Association
and the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists, endorsed Barr Laboratories'
application in a December 2003 letter to the
FDA. If emergency contraceptives are widely
available, the rates of unintended pregnancy
and abortion in America could be reduced by
up to one-half, according to the letter.
Though a spokeswoman for Barr Laboratories, Carol
Cox, declined to comment on the newly filed
suit, she expressed hope that the FDA would
allow over-the-counter sales of Plan B soon.
Groups fighting against expanded access to the
drug issued a caution against court intervention
in the drug approval process.
Ms. Wright said that if the plaintiffs in the
Brooklyn case prevail, "then the FDA would
be peppered with lawsuits from advocacy groups
looking for their drug to be approved."
Send this page to a
friend!
Home About
Us Newsletters News
Archives Donate
|