|
Boston Globe, September 7, 2004
The unwinnable war
By James Carroll
GEORGE W. BUSH finally told the truth. It happened
last week when he said of the war on terrorism,
"I don't think you can win it."
We know it was the truth because of the way it
embarrassed him, because of the way his handlers
immediately required him to repudiate it ("I
probably need to be more articulate"),
and because the mass of Republicans were deaf
to it. Just as Bush had inadvertently spoken
the exact truth about the war on terrorism
at its onset ("This crusade, this war
on terrorism"), he had inadvertently done
so again.
Six months ago, I took a leave from this column.
I had been writing obsessively about the war
for more than two years, and my truth had become
woefully repetitive. "Whatever happens
from this week forward in Iraq," I wrote
in March, "the main outcome of the war
is clear. We have defeated ourselves."
In the time since I wrote that, I confess, even
my bleak vision has come to seem like the good
old days. After all, that was before Abu Ghraib,
before the siege of Najaf, before the Sunnis
and Shi'ites discovered that their hatred of
the occupiers outweighed their hatred of each
other, before the handover of Fallujah to outlaw
militants, before Ahmed Chalabi's disgrace
(and last week's rehabilitation), before Washington's
installation in Baghdad of a blatant puppet
regime, before the death toll of young Americans
approached 1,000.
Citizens of the United States are a decent, fair-minded
people. The only reason we tolerate what is
being done in our name in Iraq is that, for
us, this war exists only in the realm of metaphor.
The words "war on terrorism" fall
on our ears much in the way that "war
on poverty" or "war on drugs"
did.
War is an abstraction in the American imagination.
It lives there, cloaked in glory, as an emblem
of patriotism. We show our love for our country
by sending our troops abroad and then "supporting"
them, no matter what. When images appear that
contradict the high-flown rhetoric of war --
whether of young GIs disgracefully humiliating
Iraqi prisoners or of a devastated holy city
where vast fields of American-created rubble
surround a shrine -- we simply do not take
them in as real. Thinking of ourselves as only
motivated by good intentions, we cannot fathom
the possibility that we have demonized an innocent
people, that what we are doing is murder on
a vast scale.
There is the single most troubling aspect of
the war in Iraq. We launched it against the
wicked Saddam Hussein, yet the majority of
so-called "insurgents" against whom
our forces are arrayed hated Hussein more than
we did. We are killing people by the thousands
who threaten absolutely nothing of ours.
The boys in the Iraqi resistance are not terrorists.
They are not Ba'athists. They are not jihadists
-- or they weren't until we gave them reason
to be. Whatever the justifications for the
invasion of Iraq were a year and a half ago,
why are we in this war today? And as President
Bush might ask, how in the world do we "win"
it?
Obviously, something else is going on below the
surface of all the stated reasons for this
war. The Republican convention last week was
gripped with war fever, and the fever itself
was the revelation. War is answering an American
need that has nothing to do with the Iraqi
people.
Even though the war on terrorism is indeed, as
the president said, a "crusade,"
it has nothing real to do with Islam either,
although Islam is surely its target. Not Islam
as it actually exists in dozens of different
settings and cultures across the globe, but
an imagined Islam that exists only in the troubled
minds of a people who project "evil"
outward and then attack it. Alas, it is an
old Christian habit.
The war, meanwhile, answers the Bush administration's
need to justify an unprecedented repressiveness
in the "homeland," and simultaneously
prompts widespread docile submission to the
new martial law. But more deeply still, by
understanding ourselves as a people at war,
we Americans find exemption from the duty to
face the grotesque shame of what we are doing
in the world.
So the final truth about this war is that there
is no real enemy (although we are creating
enemies by the legion). There will be no victory.
I resume this regular column by declaring,
President Bush was right.
James Carroll's column appears regularly in
the Globe.
© Copyright 2004 Globe Newspaper Company.
FAIR USE NOTICE
This
site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in
our efforts to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights,
economic, democracy, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the
US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material
from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner.
|