|
New York Times, July 24, 2005
Prostitution
Puts U.S. and Brazil at Odds on AIDS Policy
Author : Larry Rohter
RIO DE JANEIRO, July 23 - In their baseball caps
and T-shirts adorned with a rose in the shape
of a heart, they are a familiar and welcome
presence in the red-light district on the outskirts
of downtown here. For years now, they have
been distributing condoms to the prostitutes
who work the streets, part of the Brazilian
government's larger effort to hold AIDS in
check.
Until recently, the condom campaign of the group
called Fio da Alma had been partly financed
through the United States Agency for International
Development. But no longer: rather than comply
with an American demand that all foreign recipients
of AIDS assistance must explicitly condemn
prostitution, Brazil has decided to forgo up
to $40 million in American support.
"Our feeling was that the manner in which
the Usaid funds were consigned would bring
harm to our program from the point of view
of its scientific credibility, its ethical
values and its social commitment," Pedro
Chequer, director of the Brazilian government's
AIDS program, said in an interview in Brasilía.
"We must remain faithful to the established
principles of the scientific method and not
allow theological beliefs and dogma to interfere."
Experts here and abroad say the disagreement
over how to deal with prostitution is symptomatic
of a larger conflict between Brazil and the
United States over AIDS policy. Brazil, which
spends more than $400 million annually on what
is regarded as the most successful AIDS program
in the developing world, is taking a pragmatic
approach in combating the global epidemic,
the experts say, while the United States, increasingly,
is not.
"It's not as if you're choosing between
two neutral policy programs," said Chris
Beyrer of the Center for Public Health and
Human Rights at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg
School of Public Health. "Brazil has good
data to show that their approach works, and
to ask them to change that, even if they get
the additional money, to one for which there
is no evidence, just because of moral squeamishness
in the United States, is an extraordinary position
to take."
Dr. Beyrer is one of several thousand AIDS specialists
from all over the world who have gathered here
for an annual conference of the International
AIDS Society that begins Monday. Mark Dybul,
deputy coordinator and chief medical officer
for the Bush administration's global AIDS initiative,
is also taking part, and says the prostitution
controversy is not only overblown, but is also
an example of the many misconceptions about
American policy.
"On the ground, this isn't an issue,"
Dr. Dybul said in an interview here on Friday.
"Part of a compassionate response involves
meeting people where they are and working with
them."
He added, "Each country has a sovereign
right to make decisions for themselves, and
we respect that." But in order to receive
American aid, he said, "it does require
an acknowledgment that prostitution is not
a good thing and to be opposed to it."
One gauge of Brazil's success in confronting
AIDS is to compare the situation here with
that of other developing countries, many of
which have sent delegations to study the Brazilian
program. In 1990, for example, Brazil and South
Africa had roughly the same rate of prevalence
of H.I.V. among their adult populations, just
over 1 percent.
Today, some studies indicate that 20 percent
or more of South African adults of reproductive
age are infected with H.I.V. or have AIDS,
an estimated total of more than 5 million of
the country's 44 million people. In Brazil,
in contrast, the rate has dropped nearly by
half, and the number of patients being treated
has held steady, at about 600,000 out of a
total population of 180 million.
"The Brazilian program very early on attempted
to recognize that this is a pandemic that could
travel through the population if there weren't
programs to provide education and give special
attention to vulnerable groups," said
Mark Schneider, who was the Agency for International
Development's director for Latin America in
the Clinton administration and has worked at
the Pan-American Health Organization.
"They attempted to take out the stigma and
practice safe sex so as to prevent the epidemic
from expanding, and in that way they were well
ahead of other countries, particularly in the
developing world."
But the Brazilian approach is anathema to many
conservatives in the United States because
it makes use of methods seen as morally objectionable.
Brazil not only operates a needle and syringe
exchange program for drug addicts but also
rejects the Bush administration's emphasis
on abstinence, being faithful and the controlled
use of condoms, the so-called ABC approach,
in favor of a pragmatism that recognizes that
sexual desire can sometimes overwhelm reason.
"Obviously abstinence is the safest way
to avoid AIDS," Dr. Chequer said. "But
it's not viable in an operational sense unless
you are proposing that mankind be castrated
or genetically altered, and then you would
end up with something that is not human but
something else altogether."
"If we increasingly focus the prevention
of AIDS along these lines, we are generating
carnage, a slaughter," he said. "It's
not a realistic vision, and the epidemic is
going to grow larger and larger."
Brazil, of course, is not the only country to
have been affected by the American policy.
Senegal has one of the lowest H.I.V. prevalence
rates in Africa, but has been cut off from
the Bush administration initiative, public
health experts said, because prostitution has
been legal there since 1969. And in Central
American countries like Guatemala, religious
groups supported by American financing have
distributed fliers to prostitutes urging them
to adopt the ABC approach.
Fio da Alma, which means Thread of the Soul in
Portuguese, is one of about 30 AIDS groups
across Brazil that works with prostitutes in
cooperation with an organization called Da
Vida, or For Life. As many as one million condoms
a month are distributed through that program,
one of several that were initially financed
in part through the American aid agency and
were expected to continue as part of a grant
that would last through 2008.
The United States wanted to remain involved because
the White House in 2003 announced a five-year
$15 billion program known as the President's
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. Congress has
authorized financing, but also required that
all groups getting American money make an explicit
statement of policy opposing prostitution and
sex trafficking.
Brazilian AIDS groups that work with prostitutes
argue that they are not endorsing the sex trade.
Because many of those involved in the Brazilian
program are prostitutes themselves, they know
the risks involved.
"With what we do, we are definitely not
encouraging the sexual exploitation of women
and girls," said Ivanilda Lima, 64, the
director of Fio da Alma, who said she had been
a prostitute herself since age 13. "We
just want women who are already on the streets
to be able to protect their health."
Brazil and the Bush administration have differed
on other AIDS-related issues in the past, including
what Dr. Chequer described as a recent effort
to get Brazil to endorse the ABC approach.
But in each case, he said, the two sides managed
to find a middle ground without violating their
own principles.
Over the prostitution issue, however, a compromise
does not appear possible. Even if the Bush
administration were willing to offend the conservative
religious groups that are one of its main constituencies,
its hands would be tied by the Congressional
legislation. "We follow the law,"
Dr. Dybul said. "The law says that groups
must oppose prostitution, and we will enforce
that. We believe that prostitution is a bad
thing, both for H.I.V. infection and for the
individual. But we are opposed to the activity,
not to the person."
Brazilian AIDS workers, on the other hand, argue
that even if the Ministry of Health here were
willing to accept the American demand, it could
not do so legally. Under Brazilian law, two
people having sex in exchange for money is
neither a felony nor a misdemeanor, but an
infraction much like a traffic violation (although
procurement is a crime).
"Prostitution in Brazil isn't legalized,
but it's not illegal either," Dr. Chequer
explained.
In addition, Brazilian labor law recognizes "sex
worker" as a profession. That entitles
prostitutes, call girls and street hustlers
to contribute to the official government pension
fund and to receive benefits when they retire.
"We view prostitutes as partners in this
effort, partners who are efficient and competent"
in getting Brazilians to give up dangerous
sexual behavior, Dr. Chequer said.
"Prostitution exists everywhere in the world,
including the United States, and we have a
commitment to work with this group and respect
them."
<< New York Times -- 7/24/05 >>
Send this page to a
friend!
Home About
Us Newsletters News
Archives Donate
|