|
New York Times , May 19, 2005
EDITORIAL: Preserving
the Global AIDS Fund
The world has two big programs that fight AIDS
in poor countries. One, created by President
Bush, will spend more than a billion dollars
in 15 hard-hit nations this year. It is a very
important lifesaving initiative, but it could
do even more. The pharmaceutical industry has
kept it from buying cheap generic versions
of AIDS medicines. And the religious right
has pushed it toward abstinence-only programs
and away from the people most likely to become
infected: prostitutes, gays and intravenous-drug
users.
Fortunately, there is also the Global Fund to
Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which
has been free to do the work America shuns.
But its ability to continue to do so is at
risk.
In April, the Global Fund's board set up a committee
for policy and strategy that is so powerful
it has been described as a shadow executive
board. The fund's board is choosing a leader
for the supercommittee this week, but at the
moment there is one candidate: Randall Tobias,
who runs Mr. Bush's AIDS program. Mr. Tobias
may be approved to avoid angering the United
States, the fund's largest donor, but the risk
to its independence is too great.
Mr. Tobias did the right thing this week by quashing,
at least for now, an effort by American religious
conservatives to make the thousands of groups
getting grants from the Global Fund sign a
pledge that they oppose prostitution. Many
groups would have refused to sign, not because
they favor prostitution, but because they see
a pledge as an ideological test that would
hinder their ability to help women who are
forced into sex work.
On many other occasions, however, Mr. Tobias
has been quite willing to follow the agenda
of the religious right.
Last fall, he approved a grant for a program
run by a well-connected conservative foundation
to promote sexual abstinence among African
youth - even though the evaluation panel had
ruled it undeserving, The Washington Post reported
in February.
He has disparaged scientific evidence that condoms
are effective in preventing the spread of AIDS.
And Mr. Tobias, a former chief executive of
the drug company Eli Lilly, has set up numerous
roadblocks in the path of generic drugs.
If Mr. Tobias ran the policy committee, religious
conservatives would have a direct channel into
the Global Fund. Even if Mr. Tobias wanted
to, he might not be able to resist that pressure.
It is bad enough that the American program
ties the hands of those fighting AIDS. It would
be far worse if the Global Fund did so, too.
<< New York Times 05/19/05 >>
Send this page to a
friend!
Home About
Us Newsletters News
Archives Donate
|