|
Boston Globe, July 1, 2004
Action Urged On Morning-after
Pill in Mass.
BYLINE: Elise Castelli, Globe Correspondent
Abortion rights supporters urged House Speaker
Thomas M. Finneran yesterday to allow debate
on legislation to make the morning-after contraceptive
pill more easily available, over fierce objections
from Catholic Church leaders who say that the
bill would force Catholic hospitals to violate
the church's teachings on abortion.
The bill, approved by the Senate June 16, would
require all Massachusetts emergency rooms to
distribute information about the morning-after
pill to rape victims and, if requested, to
make the pill available to the patient. The
bill also would allow specially trained pharmacists
to issue the pill to women without a prescription.
Yesterday, the bill's House sponsors sent a petition
signed by 56 representatives to Finneran, demanding
immediate action on the bill. If the matter
does not go to the House floor by the close
of the legislative session, expected to be
at the end of July, it will die. Six other
states have similar legislation.
In Massachusetts, the Catholic Church and other
abortion opponents have mounted a lobbying
campaign against the legislation. An editorial
in The Pilot, the official newspaper of the
Archdiocese, said the bill "will oblige
Catholic hospitals to cooperate with the evil
of abortion" and labeled the measure "an
attack on religious freedom."
"It's trying to force our Catholic hospitals
to do something we shouldn't and couldn't do,"
said Gerry D'Avolio, executive director of
the Massachusetts Catholic Conference. "It's
trying to force a standard of care in emergency
rooms not everyone agrees on."
A spokesman for Finneran, an abortion opponent,
declined to comment.
Supporters of the bill say the bill is necessary
to ensure that rape victims have quick access
to the pill. The drug is most effective within
72 hours after intercourse. If the pill is
taken within 12 hours of intercourse, the chance
of pregnancy is 0.4 percent.
"We see women every year who were raped
and not told about [the pill] and have an unintended
pregnancy," said Petra Langer, spokeswoman
for Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts.
A survey done by NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts
and the Emergency Contraceptive Network found
that 12 of the state's 71 hospitals do not
provide the morning-after pill. Only six of
those 12 hospitals were Catholic. In addition,
36 percent of the state's Catholic hospitals
offered the contraceptive pill to those who
asked, the survey found .
Representative Martin Walsh, a Dorchester Democrat
who sponsored the bill, said: "The horror
for a rape victim will never go away. . . .
We don't need to add to the problems of that."
Walsh said he would like to see the bill moved
out of the Ways and Means Committee and approved
within the next five days, to provide time
for the Legislature to override a veto by the
governor.
Shawn Feddeman, spokeswoman for Governor Mitt
Romney, declined to comment on the governor's
position on the bill. "We'll have to review
it when it reaches the governor's desk,"
she said.
The Food and Drug Administration approved the
pill in 1999, and since then more than 2.4
million doses have been administered in the
United States, according to Dr. Michael F.
Greene, a former FDA official who appeared
at a press conference held by bill supporters
yesterday. In December the FDA decided that
the pill would not be made available over the
counter nationally.
According to Greene, the pill works like a birth
control pill, blocking ovulation and preventing
fertilization or implantation of an egg. It
has no effect on women who are already pregnant,
he said.
But under Catholic doctrine, preventing implantation
is equivalent to abortion. The church's position
is that preventive measures should be given
to rape victims only if conception has not
occurred. Any treatment that would interfere
with a fertilized ovum is forbidden by church
directives.
"They're trying to redefine pregnancy,"
said Darby Duffin, communications director
for Massachusetts Citizens for Life.
<< The Boston Globe -- 7/1/04 >>
FAIR USE NOTICE
This
site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in
our efforts to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights,
economic, democracy, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the
US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material
from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner.
|