|
Star Tribune (USA), June 21, 2004
A clip instead of a snip; New
approaches to male contraception
BYLINE: Janet Moore; Staff Writer
Mention the V-word - vasectomy - to most men,
and the response likely will entail one of
the following:
1. A shifting or crossing of the legs.
2. A protective arm or hand moving swiftly toward
their lower half.
3. Wincing.
About 4 million vasectomies are performed on
men worldwide each year, more than 500,000
of them in the United States. But it's probably
safe to say it is not an eagerly anticipated
event. Beyond the symbolism associated with
the perceived loss of potency, many men fear
the pain and swelling occasionally related
to the procedure.
"There's a lot of myth and misunderstanding
about vasectomies," said Dr. Charles Wilson,
who founded the Vasectomy Clinic in Seattle.
"That's basically what we're up against.
It's actually a very safe and effective procedure."
Research into new methods of birth control has
traditionally focused on women. Now, two Twin
Cities companies have developed or are in the
process of developing alternatives to the vasectomy
for men.
The $3.5 billion U.S. contraceptive market, which
includes pills, condoms, sponges, rings and
implants, seems ripe for a new method aimed
at men, especially since the male pill still
is being developed.
VMBC of Roseville has been selling its Vasclip
device for more than a year to great media
fanfare and growing interest among consumers.
Shepherd Medical of Minneapolis is a development-stage
company that recently received a $1.4 million
grant from the National Institutes of Health/Small
Business Innovation Research program to investigate
a type of vasectomy that might be less invasive
and perhaps reversible.
"It's exciting to have something new to
talk about and bring attention to the field,"
Wilson said. "We have pretty good technology
now, but if we can improve on it, that's what
we want to do."
New company
In 1995, with some gentle prompting from his
wife, Jim Segermark decided to have a vasectomy.
"The [doctor] told me he was cutting and
burning and tying my vas deferens in knots
and there was a good chance of leakage and
pain," he said, adding, "Of course,
guys are babies."
Although doctors use different procedures, a
vasectomy generally involves an incision or
puncture in the scrotum to expose the vas deferens,
tubes that carry the sperm out of the testes,
which are snipped and the ends cauterized (or
burned). The tubes are tied shut and then tucked
inside.
The procedure interrupts the sperm's route from
the testicles, where they are produced, to
the penis. Once the vasectomy is performed,
the testicles still generate sperm, but their
movement is blocked.
Vasectomies are intended to be permanent, although
5 percent to 11 percent of men who have vasectomies
later regret the decision, according to a recent
article by Dr. Harvey Simon, an associate professor
at the Harvard Medical School. Some opt to
have it reversed, a difficult, expensive and
not-always-successful option.
Segermark ended up backing out of his vasectomy.
Twice. Finally, he thought, "This is ridiculous."
After researching patents, raising an undisclosed
amount of money from private investors and
receiving clearance from the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA), Vasclip was born.
Today, Segermark calls himself Chairman and First
Patient of privately held VMBC. (It says so
on his business card; the second patient was
the company's engineer.)
The Vasclip is a tiny plastic device the size
of a grain of rice that clips the vas deferens
shut. The procedure, performed on an outpatient
basis, takes less than 15 minutes. The company
markets the Vasclip as permanent but hopes
to conduct more studies to determine whether
it can be easily reversed.
Although insurers typically will pay for a traditional
vasectomy, patients must pay $400 to $500 for
a Vasclip kit containing the device.
Segermark hired David Elliot, a veteran of the
medical device industry, as CEO to run the
business, which has six employees in its spartan
offices in Roseville. To date, the company
has shipped about 2,300 units.
VMBC has done very little advertising and relies
heavily on word-of-mouth, its Web site (http://www.vasclip.com)
and media coverage. The device has been written
up in national publications such as Esquire
and Glamour, which recently rated Vasclip as
the best in "No-Excuses Male Birth Control"
with an accompanying illustration featuring
a hot dog clipped by a clothespin.
The company sponsored a clinical trial that claims
124 Vasclip recipients experienced fewer complications
and less pain than typical vasectomy patients.
"The day after, they called and asked if
I was experiencing any pain or reduction in
activity," said Charlie Garrett of Eagan,
who was enrolled in the Vasclip clinical trial.
"I was sitting on the roller coaster with
my daughter at Camp Snoopy at the Mall of America."
Garrett is now a VMBC shareholder.
Other ideas
But not all doctors recommend Vasclip. Some say
more clinical data are needed before they recommend
it to patients.
"Doctors will always ask, 'How effective
is it? How safe is it?' We don't have enough
data on [Vasclip] to use it, in my opinion,"
said the Vasectomy Clinic's Wilson.
"Unless you do a head-to-head study, you
cannot make inferences that Vasclip is safer
than a vasectomy," said Dr. Jon Pryor,
professor and chairman of the department of
urologic surgery at the University of Minnesota.
"It's impossible to do."
Pryor, who is a founder of Shepherd Medical,
is unsure his own company will come up with
a foolproof method that advances the traditional
vasectomy. But he's hopeful: "We're going
to do all the tests to find out."
The grant from the National Institutes of Health
should help in that regard. "This is a
very large grant for the program," said
Pat Dillon, executive director of Minnesota
Project Innovation, which helps companies with
the government funding process. "I think
an innovative approach to the vasectomy will
hopefully give people more options."
The technology acquired by Shepherd Medical was
first developed in the 1970s by Dr. Lourens
Zaneveld, a retired professor in the department
of obstetrics and gynecology at Rush University
in Chicago. It involves plugging each vas deferens
with two silicone tubes, a process that may
be reversible.
The government grant will be used to finish preclinical
studies and enroll about 100 patients in a
clinical trial early next year, according to
Jim Stice, Shepherd Medical's president and
CEO. As a founder of FlexMedics Inc. and a
former chairman of Medical Alley, Stice is
well-acquainted with medical technology in
the Twin Cities.
He cites previous animal studies using the technology
and a more-recent human clinical trial in Brazil
that showed that sperm can be blocked in the
vas deferens.
Beyond the grant, Shepherd Medical has relied
on funding from friends and family worth "several
hundred thousand dollars," Stice said,
noting it will take at least five years for
the company's product to be approved by the
FDA.
Still, Stice is encouraged. "There seems
to be a lack of innovation on the male side
[of birth control]. There have been a lot of
ideas generated, but not a lot of commercialization.
It's just a matter of refining ideas."
Janet Moore is at jmmoore@startribune.com.
New vasectomy technologies
VASCLIP
The Vasclip device, sold by VMBC LLC of Roseville,
is a small plastic clip the size of a grain
of rice that clamps the vas deferens. The Vasclip
stops the flow of sperm after a doctor attaches
it to each of the vas deferens. The device
was cleared by the Food and Drug Administration
last year and is currently available to consumers.
SHEPHERD MEDICAL
This technology involves making a small incision
on each of the vas deferens and inserting a
silicone tube to block the flow of sperm. Shepherd
Medical recently received $1.4 million from
the government to develop the technology.
<< Star Tribune -- 6/21/04 >>
FAIR USE NOTICE
This
site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in
our efforts to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights,
economic, democracy, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the
US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material
from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner.
|