|
The Guardian (London), July 15, 2004
US Defends Abstinence Policy
Amid Uproar
BYLINE: Sarah Boseley in Bangkok
The man charged with implementing George Bush's
$ 15bn (£8bn) emergency plan to fight
Aids yesterday embarked on a spirited defence
of American policy, calling for his opponents
to sink their differences with the US in the
interests of global action against the disease.
Randall Tobias, speaking to the International
Aids conference in Bangkok, supported policies
that have been heavily criticised - such as
sexual abstinence - as the best way to avoid
HIV/Aids. He also backed the US's determination
to spend its money on its own bilateral priorities
in selected countries. He suggested that the
sometimes aggressive opposition to the US way
of doing things was counter-productive.
"Let me say this as directly as I can: HIV/Aids
is the real enemy," he said. "The
denial, stigma and complacency that fuel HIV/Aids
- these too are the real enemies. It is morally
imperative that we direct our energies at these
enemies, not at one another.
"We may not agree on every tactic employed
by every donor and we may have passionate opinions
about how things can be done better, but we
must work with each other to find the best
solutions, while knowing that every person
in this fight simply wants to save lives. That
is a noble calling and should be appreciated
and respected."
Demonstrators delayed Mr Tobias's presentation,
chanting "Bush lies, people die".
He declined to go to the podium until the placards
in front of him stating "He lies"
were lowered.
But he did not duck the controversial issues.
He cited the Ugandan president, Yoweri Museveni,
in support of the US "ABC" policy
- abstinence, be faithful and condoms - "where
appropriate".
Mr Tobias said: "When we say we are listening,
and we say those on the ground know best, then
we must surely listen and learn from the man
who has led one of the most successful and
pivotal battles against this disease. Yoweri
Museveni has, largely by sheer leadership and
will, fought back this disease in his country
with an ABC prevention focus.
"We must learn from his leadership in the
fight against Aids. Abstinence works . . .
being faithful works . . . condoms work. Each
has its place."
The UN agencies have all expressed their doubts
about abstinence and fidelity, pointing out
that women in southern Africa often do not
have the power to say no and that married women
are more likely to be infected with HIV, via
their unfaithful husbands, than unmarried women.
"There is an urgent need to rethink the
ABC approach," said Thoraya Obaid, executive
director of the UN's Population Fund, at the
launch of a report which outlined the dire
plight of women in southern Africa, who make
up 57% of those now infected and unable to
protect themselves.
But Mr Tobias said there was confusion about
the US position and there was no right answer
to preventing the spread of Aids. "Those
who want to simplify the solution to just one
method, any one method, do not understand the
complexity of the problem," he said.
The US president's emergency plan for Aids relief
(Pepfar) would work with local people in affected
areas, he said, giving money directly to groups
in the communities who would know best what
worked for them.
Mr Tobias, who has expressed doubts about the
quality of the generic Aids drugs made in India,
said if the drugs were submitted for approval
by the US drug regulators, they would be eligible
for US purchase "so long as international
patent agreements and local government policies
allow their purchase".
The US has been criticised for failing to put
more money into the Global Fund for HIV/Aids,
Tuberculosis and Malaria, which funds programmes
put forward by developing world governments.
The fund was "a young venture and still
maturing", Mr Tobias said, but "a
very promising vehicle and a critically important
part of the work that all of us are doing".
<< The Guardian - 07/15/04 >>
FAIR USE NOTICE
This
site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in
our efforts to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights,
economic, democracy, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the
US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material
from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner.
|