|
Christian Science Monitor (USA), June 23, 2004
US chastity crusade gets cool
response in secular Britain
BYLINE: By Mark Rice-Oxley Correspondent of The
Christian Science Monitor
CLAYGATE, ENGLAND -- Lisa High's story is a
classic salutary tale of adolescent sex. After
getting her pregnant at 17, her boyfriend got
cold feet. She thought briefly of abortion,
but couldn't go through with it.
Now Lisa is 21, a single mom living in South
London - but she is hardly unique. Every year,
40,000 British girls under 18 become pregnant,
a promiscuity "epidemic" that gives
Britain by far the highest rate of teenage
mothers in Western Europe.
Figures like these have persuaded an American
group espousing total chastity to bring its
missionary zeal to Britain's teenagers.
The Silver Ring Thing, which claims to have won
over 22,000 young Americans to the virtues
of abstinence, is bringing more than two dozen
of its converts to spread the word through
a series of glitzy media events starting Friday
in this town south of London.
Yet the Silver Ring Thing tour is proving controversial
before it has even started.
Early press coverage has been snippy at best,
hostile at worst. Cultural commentators have
scoffed that outreach based on American Christian-based
values, supported by $ 700,000 in US federal
funds, will not necessarily transplant easily
in a society that has become defiantly secular.
Government officials argue that a vow of chastity
is a brittle line of defense, that self-discipline
often falters - and then what?
For Lisa High, the abstinence message just might
have made a difference.
"I think it's a message that should be told
to our kids," she says. "I would
have listened [to the notion of abstinence]
if it had come from another teenager."
Many young people, however, ridicule the very
idea of abstinence.
"I didn't listen to the message then and
I wouldn't now," says Beckie Darvill,
a 21-year-old mother of two who had her first
child when she was 16.
"I went to a Catholic school and was told
all that stuff, not to have sex, stay a virgin
until you're married, but I didn't. Young people
nowadays just want to grow up faster."
The indifferent British response is irksome to
Silver Ring Thing founder Denny Pattyn, and
ordained minister who wonders why a society
with such a big problem is unwilling to look
at new ways to deal with it.
Since the 1960s, when the sexual revolution threw
off the last vestiges of Victorian values,the
British approach has started from the position
that many children will experiment with sex.
Information is therefore crucial, and efforts
have concentrated on sex education in schools,
informing children about contraception, sexually
transmitted diseases (STDs), risk reduction,
and family planning.
Yet statistics show the approach has yet to turn
the tide. Teen pregnancy rates in Britain remain
five times as high as some parts of Europe
such as the Netherlands and Sweden - though
still much lower than in the United States.
Officials blame it on a historical reluctance
to talk openly about sex in private - particularly
on the part of parents reluctant to relate
to the growing sexuality of their teenage offspring.
The Rev. Mr. Pattyn says the statistics show
the approach thus far has failed. He says the
overall message is too confusing and that teenagers
need clearer guidance.
"Anyone who deals with teenagers knows you
can't give them a mixed message," he says.
"They are going to take the risk."
He freely admits that he does not expect to convert
every last British teenager to the ways of
premarital purity. But he argues that every
young person who takes the vow and dons the
$ 12 silver ring granted as part of an abstinence
"ceremony" is another youth spared
the misery of unwanted pregnancy and STDs such
as chlamydia and gonorrhea. Government figures
show that the number of STD "episodes"
doubled in Britain between 1991 and 2001.
"Britain has a critical problem and abstinence
is an answer," he says in a telephone
interview from Sewickley, Pa. "We are
bringing over kids who will stand before you
and say it is working in their lives and that
they are thrilled to have answer to what's
attacking them and their generation: STD and
teenage pregnancy."
Yet critics are adamant that abstinence is not
the answer. A recent US survey showed that
those who have taken chastity vows have almost
the same rate of STDs as other young people
because they are less likely to practice safe
sex if they "fall off the wagon."
"Signing up children to a pledge that they
could potentially fail is not the way to go,"
says Rhodri Jones of the government's Teenage
Pregnancy Unit, a special team set up six years
ago to reverse youth pregnancy rates.
"Young people stick with it for a while
and then the pledge is broken and they are
left without a safety net."
The government prefers the message offered by
a domestic program called APAUSE (Added Power
and Understanding in Sex Education) that counsels
an ABC of good practice (Abstinence, Be faithful,
use a Condom).
One of its architects, John Tripp of Exeter University,
says that while Britain is unlikely to embrace
US chastity evangelists, it can learn from
US efforts to change cultural norms.
Part of the problem, he says, is that sex will
continue to be used as a selling point in the
media and peer pressure will remain intense.
But there is no reason, he adds, why a strong
public campaign (supported by proponents more
credible than Britney Spears) cannot steer
morality in a new direction.
"We shouldn't knock the possibility that
culture can be changed," Mr. Tripp says,
noting recent successful efforts by Uganda
to reverse critical sexually transmitted infection
rates. "It's not a losing battle."
He says society has to stop giving young people
a double message, glamorizing sex while at
the same time advocating responsible behavior
in school-based sex education.
"If the mood changes and people start to
criticize the press for giving this double
message it will change," Tripp says. "Just
look at drinking driving: Young people have
got that message far better than older generations."
(c) Copyright 2004. The Christian Science Monitor
<< Christian Science Monitor -- 6/23/04
>>
FAIR USE NOTICE
This
site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in
our efforts to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights,
economic, democracy, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes
a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the
US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material
from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner.
|