|
New York Times, April 2, 2005
Illinois Pharmacies
Ordered to Provide Birth Control
By MONICA DAVEY
CHICAGO, April 1 - With a growing number of reports
of pharmacists around the country refusing
to fill prescriptions for birth control and
emergency contraception, Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich
on Friday filed a rule requiring Illinois pharmacies
to accept and dispense all such prescriptions
promptly.
"Our regulation says that if a woman goes
to a pharmacy with a prescription for birth
control, the pharmacy or the pharmacist is
not allowed to discriminate or to choose who
he sells it to or who he doesn't sell it to,"
Mr. Blagojevich, a Democrat, said. "No
delays. No hassles. No lectures."
Two Chicago women, he said, reported in February
that they had been turned away from a downtown
drugstore when they tried to fill prescriptions
for morning-after birth control pills. On Friday,
the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional
Regulation filed a formal complaint against
that pharmacy, one in the Osco chain, and said
it could face discipline ranging from a fine
to the revocation of its license. No one from
Osco's corporate offices could be reached for
comment on Friday.
Nationally, the leaders of Planned Parenthood
and Naral Pro-Choice America said they had
seen more and more cases like that over the
past year. They emphasized that women in smaller
communities or in rural areas, with perhaps
only one pharmacy to use, might be left unable
to receive their prescribed birth control if
the pattern was allowed to continue.
"Pharmacies have an ethical and legal obligation,"
said Nancy Keenan, the president of Naral.
Governor Blagojevich, saying that his emergency
rule clarified an existing state requirement,
said he suspected that the pattern of complaints
over the past year was no coincidence, but
rather "part of a concerted effort"
to prevent women from getting the birth control
they wanted.
Under the emergency rule put in place in Illinois,
pharmacies that do not have a particular prescribed
contraceptive would be required to order some
or to send the prescription to another pharmacy.
But Susan C. Winckler of the American Pharmacists
Association, which represents 52,000 pharmacists,
said she had concerns about the emergency rule
in Illinois. The association, she said, believes
that pharmacists should be allowed to "step
away" in cases where they feel uncomfortable
dispensing a particular drug - so long as their
customers can still get their drugs from alternative
sources.
Ms. Winckler said she also worried that Governor
Blagojevich's new rule might reach beyond the
question of a pharmacist's own moral sensibilities,
and require pharmacists to dispense all prescriptions,
even those that were "clinically inappropriate"
for patients. Such cases might include ones
in which a pharmacist discovered a customer's
allergy or a potential drug interaction that
a prescribing doctor had missed.
"Depending on the wording of the rule, there
is a real risk that the governor could be creating,"
Ms. Winckler said. "The pharmacist is
not a gas station attendant where if there
is gas you have to sell it. Pharmacists are
supposed to assess the appropriateness of a
drug."
Abby Ottenhoff, a spokeswoman for Mr. Blagojevich,
said the new rule did not take away a pharmacist's
right to counsel a patient about a prescription
within the confines of existing state law.
"That doesn't change," she said. "What
cannot happen is the pharmacist cannot allow
personal factors and feelings to interfere."
Send this page to a
friend!
Home About
Us Newsletters News
Archives Donate
|